Legal & Compliance Home

The DFEH Offers Further Guidance on SB 973 Reporting

In February 2021, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) issued more detailed guidance for covered employers that are scrambling to submit the required pay data report to the DFEH by the March 31, 2021 deadline.
March 16, 2021
The DFEH Offers Further Guidance on SB 973 Reporting

The DFEH Offers Further Guidance on SB 973 Reporting

In October 2020, EP issued a Legal and Labor Alert on California’s new pay data reporting law, SB 973. And in February 2021, nearly five months after the September 2020 passage of SB 973, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) issued more detailed guidance for covered employers that are scrambling to submit the required pay data report to the DFEH by the March 31, 2021 deadline. This was in addition to the several rounds of FAQs, sample reporting template, and 70-page User Guide that also were published by the DFEH to clarify how to comply with this new reporting obligation.

As a brief overview, the law applies to employers who (1)(a) regularly employed 100 or more employees during the reporting year (2020), or (b) employed 100 or more employees during the “snapshot period,” and (2) are required to file federal EEO-1 reports. The “snapshot period” is the single pay period chosen by the employer between October 1 and December 31 of each reporting year to determine which employees it must report on in the aggregate.

I. In February 2021, The DFEH Published An Excel Template To Help Covered Employers Navigate This New Reporting Obligation Before The March 31, 2021 Deadline

The DFEH published an excel template that provides a model for employers to follow in preparing their pay data report, which can be found in the “Excel Template” link here. This excel template includes tabs, indicating what information is required in Sections 1 and 2 of the report, depending on whether the employer is reporting as a single-establishment employer or a multi-establishment employer. Multi-establishment employers must report all of their establishment-level data in a single report.

Studios and production companies will need to determine whether they will submit reports for their employing entities collectively, as a single employer, or whether they will submit separate employer reports at a lower level (i.e., at the division or production company level). Studios and production companies should consult with their legal advisors because whether they file a single data report or multiple employer data reports may have legal consequences in other areas.

A. Section 1 Of The Pay Data Report Seeks Background Information On The Employer
Section 1 requires a covered employer to fill in at least 26 mandatory rows, each of which requests information on the employer’s background. This information includes, among other things, the employer’s contact information, headquarter address, chosen “snapshot period,” California SEIN and federal EIN. Section 1 also requires the employer to indicate whether it is owned or affiliated with another company, or if there is centralized, integrated or similar ownership, control, management or compensation (such as the same management personnel or central control of personnel policies, stock plans and/or labor relations) between a group of separate entities.
B. Section 2 Of The Pay Data Report Seeks Complex Sets Of Data Based On Combinations Of Job Category, Pay Band, And Race/Ethnicity/Gender
The DFEH’s excel template also includes tabs indicating what information is required in the more detailed Section 2 of the report. As the Pay Data Reporting User Guide makes clear, Section 2 of each report will “contain[] detailed rows for each combination of Establishment, Job Category, Race/Ethnicity/Sex, and Pay Band information.” Each combination will include information on an aggregate group of employees who fall within each combination of job category, pay band, and race/ethnicity/sex during the employer’s chosen “snapshot period.” The employees who must be included are those who are assigned to California establishments and/or are working in California. And a single row per combination must be provided, using as many rows as it takes to provide a complete report. There are 2,520 possible combinations of row level report data (3 gender categories x 7 race/ethnicity categories x 10 job categories x 12 pay bands) as further explained below, even for a single establishment filer.
And, in addition to categorizing employees based on combinations of job category, pay band, and race/ethnicity/gender, employers will need to provide information in at least an additional 13 columns in Section 2. These additional columns request information on establishment name and address, as well as establishment NAICS (industry code), major work activity, number of employees falling within each combination, and total hours worked. Once an employer has combined this aggregated data, it should review its report to identify any potential wage gaps or issues based on race, gender, or ethnicity. Should any such gaps exist, employers should be prepared to justify them to the DFEH in response to any inquiries.

II. Employers May Request That The DFEH Grant A 30-Day Extension Until April 30, 2021 To Report

Because the reporting obligation imposed by SB 973 is laborious and complicated, and because the deadline also is rapidly approaching, the DFEH has offered the potential for relief in the form of a possible enforcement deferral period. Covered employers may request deferral of an order for compliance by submitting a request to the DFEH by March 31, 2021, using a required form, which can be found here. If the DFEH approves the request, the employer will have until April 30, 2021 to file its report with the DFEH.

III. EP’s Diversity Management Solution For Assistance With SB 973 Reporting

To assist clients, EP has introduced a Diversity Management solution to equip studios and production companies with the information and tools they will need to support SB 973 compliance. For more information on EP’s Diversity Management solution, please contact  epinsightsolutions@ep.com.

*   *   *   *   *

For any questions about this Alert, you may contact:

Pantea Lili Ahmadi, Senior Corporate & Employment Counsel | pahmadi@ep.com

Scott Bishop, Vice President, Employment Law | sbishop@ep.com

Joe Scudiero, Senior Vice President & Chief Labor Counsel | jscudiero@ep.com

Related Content

‘No Straight Lines’ & ‘Firstness’ Among Top Winners At Outfest Los Angeles LGBTQ Film Festival – Complete Winners List

8/24/2021
Outfest has announced the award winners of its 2021 Outfest Los Angeles LGBTQ Film Festival.
More
California Revives COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave for California Workers

California Revives COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave for California Workers

4/8/2021
On March 19, 2021, Governor Newsom of California signed into law Senate Bill 95 which revives the...

Entertainment Partners Introduces Wage Data Reporting Solution

3/26/2021
EP offers new service to help employers prepare their SB 973 reporting
Rounding Prohibited for California Non-Union Meal Breaks and Penalties

Rounding Prohibited for California Non-Union Meal Breaks and Penalties

3/10/2021
On February 25, 2021, the California Supreme Court ruled in Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC that rounding is...

Diversity and Pay Reporting in California

3/6/2021
Your guide to understanding SB 973 and its application to the entertainment industry

SB 973, California Pay Data Reporting Law FAQs

3/6/2021
The new pay data reporting law and its impact on the entertainment industry
Pantea Ahmadi and Alan Wu

California & New York Employment and Privacy Legislation Changes in 2021

1/27/2021
EP's Legal team breaks down important legislation changes impacting production hubs
Topic: Legal
Watch
December 31, 2020 Deadline for Mandatory Harassment Training in California for Non-Supervisory Employees

December 31, 2020 Deadline for Mandatory Harassment Training in California for Non-Supervisory Employees

1/25/2021
Employers with five (5) or more employees were required to provide existing non-supervisory employees in...
California Family Rights Act (CFRA) Expansion

California Family Rights Act (CFRA) Expansion

1/25/2021
CFRA underwent narrow expansion last year, reducing the employer size requirements for parental leave.
Business-Favorable Clarifications to Exclusions in AB 5 Independent Contractor Law

Business-Favorable Clarifications to Exclusions in AB 5 Independent Contractor Law

1/25/2021
Watching AB 5 during its inaugural year in action, the Legislature enacted a series of clarifications and...
New California Pay Data Reporting Requirement Under SB 973

New California Pay Data Reporting Requirement Under SB 973

1/25/2021
Private employers of 100 or more employees that also are required to file annual Employer Information...
California Revives EEO-1 Component 2 Data (Pay Bands) Reporting At State Level

California Revives EEO-1 Component 2 Data (Pay Bands) Reporting At State Level

10/19/2020
SB 973 requires that private employers of 100 or more employees that also are required to file annual...
New California Laws Adding Employer Responsibilities for COVID-19 Workplace Outbreaks

New California Laws Adding Employer Responsibilities for COVID-19 Workplace Outbreaks

9/28/2020
Two new California Laws bills impact how California employers must handle potential COVID-19 outbreaks at...
California's New Covid-19-Related Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Law

California's New Covid-19-Related Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Law

9/17/2020
AB 1867 adds Section 248.1 to the California Labor Code ("Section 248.1"), which, in addition to mandating...
December 31, 2020 Deadline for Mandatory Harassment Training in California for Non-Supervisory Employees

December 31, 2020 Deadline for Anti-Harassment Training for Non-Supervisors

8/11/2020
Employers with five or more employees must provide existing non-supervisory employees in California with...
Subscribe now

Be an industry insider with EP's
newsletters and alerts

LegalPrivacy NoticeSecurity